if i organized a dinner… would you come?

OK… i’m staring at my INBOX and once again being genuinely overwhelmed by how many messages i have yet to respond to. Many of them are because of this blog and because of folks related to the social networks space. I feel icky having not responded to people because i mean to, but i’m barely breathing myself.

So…. if i were to say that we all gather for a dinner, who would be game? I’m not proposing something formal here. I mean, hell, all of those social networks “forums” and “panels” were just overpriced social networking events anyhow, right? How about just making a large reservation and talking/eating/drinking?

I’m thinking maybe November 11th or 12th? Would this interest anyone?

what a night…

Well, the Halloween party was last night and dear me oh my. We got wind of another party being cancelled while we were setting up and we kinda held our breath. But sure enough, we got *slammed*. The place was completely full by around 10:30/11. By midnight, we had to take time off from letting people inside. That meant that there were people on the street clamoring to get in. This was not good considering the cops see crowds and break up parties. The folks at the door tried to get the crowd to disperse, but it couldn’t be kept up and the crowd kept growing. It took a bunch of strong folks physical effort to keep people at bay. Folks were on top of cars, screaming, raging drunk. Inside was another level of drunken chaos. I was trying to keep the entrance way at bay. Needless to say, we got broken up. By like 1:30ish. But honestly, i have to say phew. It was just absolute madness all night; over 900 people went in and out of that door (obviously not at once). The decorations were great, the music was great, the haunted house was awesome. But that was just a bit too much. And i forgot how much i can’t stand overly drunk frat boys; too many of them yelled at me because we wouldn’t let them in without a costume.

After it was all over, we cleaned up (way too many beer bottles) and actually got to chill out. It was so nice though because the whole community was there and so it was such a good way to spend time with friends – chaos over, friends left, yum…

Oh, and a couple of meta thoughts on the night…

1. No one takes your meanness seriously when you’re dressed like a half-naked fuzzy bunny.

2. How many times must i learn the hard way that easy access to scissors and hair dye is dangerous, especially when i decide to get creative with only a few hours left before the party? They say that the average person can learn any bit of knowledge after 8 times of repetition. Apparently, i’m very deficient at this type of knowledge acquisition.

barlow on burning man

John Perry Barlow has a few words on Burning Man and The State of the Counterculture 2004. If you identify with either BM or subcultures, you *must* read this. As with most of Barlow’s writings, this is hands-down brilliant and can be summed up with:

“If someone like Karl Rove had wanted to neutralize the most creative, intelligent, and passionate members of his opposition, he’d have a hard time coming up with a better tool than Burning Man.”

IMing at Work

From the CACM Newstrack:

A recent study of 300 firms in the U.S. and Britain- the world’s two largest instant messaging markets- found that foul language, gossiping, and office gripes are commonplace in IM missives; in fact, rarely are they used for actual business-related functions. Over 65% the office workers surveyed used IM for personal reasons during work hours; nearly 80% admitted to gossiping about coworkers; and 64% slammed or schemed against management. Almost one-third of the respondents admitted to making “sexual advances” over IM in the workplace. “While (IM) has proven itself as a productive business tool, our research validates that its free-flowing and unmonitored nature is creating enormous legal liabilities, and compliance and productivity issues for organizations worldwide,” said Steve Mullaney, of Blue Coat Systems, a California-based secure proxy appliance vendor who conducted the survey. The findings also showed U.K. respondents are more blatant in their IM usage than their tamer U.S. counterparts, primarily because 71% of the U.S. workers believed (correctly) that their IMs could be traced.

Aren’t all communication channels far and away more frequently used for gossip (i.e. network structure maintenance)? I mean, this seems to represent F2F too, thus should it be surprising that it’s occurring on IM too? Of course, i doubt that they’ll kill F2F in the workplace, while they may kill IM.

viral communications

The Media Lab just put together a new consortium called Viral Communications. When i first heard the title, i became super psyched – someone is finally studying digital virality heads on! But alas, it seems that the focus is to create technology that permits virality rather than actually trying to figure out what makes things viral online. Is anyone other than Jonah Peretti studying meme spread and virality?

privacy & friendster

The Wall Street Journal published an article today entitled “Having Lots of Online Friends Could Mean Privacy Trouble.” The article articulates some of the institutional privacy concerns that some users do have and suggests that more users should have.

Now, i do believe in privacy concerns and i’m genuinely worried about institutional misuses of private data, but i’m not the average consumers. As we all know, consumers will happily sell their privacy. They don’t understand the implications of this. And thus, there’s no incentive for corporations to not try to collect it and make money off of it. This is where the government should step in. But since the government is controlled by corporations….

Anyhow, i won’t follow that rant.

The big thing to realize is that most consumers are far more concerned with local privacy, or intimacy concerns. They’re worried about their friends taking their information out of context, about their mom seeing something intended for their friends, of a future boss seeing a drunken picture. Consumers are far more concerned with those who have limited local authority over them than institutional authority. [Yes, here’s an opportunity for a study…]

Continue reading