Monthly Archives: November 2003

don’t believe age statistics

At various times, different sites have told me about how “mature” their community is, based on age statistics that they have. Apparently, they didn’t think that it was too odd that quite a few users were “81” or “100” or “69”.

Not only is it common for users to lie, but there’s an entire population of users who purposely invert their age. Thus, if they’re really 18, they mark themselves as 81.

To get a clear picture of this, go to myspace and do a search for all users 51-100. [I say myspace because it’s allows for an easy age search.] “Bill Clinton” is the only one on the front page who looks older than 51… most look like teenagers. But apparently, there are 4064 people over 51. Hmmm.

Friendster guide to interpreting photos

OK, this is fun. Buttafly has created a Friendster Guide to Interpreting Photos.

That fun piece is in addition to an opinion piece on why one must join Friendster (to find out about how diverse your friends’ friends are). Buttafly understandably misreads the Gallery to be one’s collection of friends’ friends, without realizing that the general population should be available there and that 4 degrees is meaningless. I was talking with someone yesterday about how Friendster has constructed a misreading of degrees by their decision to only present 4 degrees. They chose 4 mostly because of technical reasons, but 4 degrees has no value when you are looking at people. Yet, by noting it as “your network” and giving you a Gallery to look at your network, it’s easy to think it means something. Unfortunately, my “network” consists of everyone from the neo-nazis to the gangstas to the midwestern teens, none of which are actually in my actual network of associates.

Confessions of a bad Friendster

“Confessions of a bad Friendster” is a hysterical article from the LATimes.

Let me just admit it. I have not been a very good Friendster. And this has let some people down. I’m sorry. Frankly, I was caught off guard by how serious everyone is about it.

Key points from this perspective:
1) Friendster is a time sync
2) a fashionable profile is essential to maintain good standing with your friends
3) creating a fashionable profile is a torturous process
4) photos are ESSENTIAL
5) reciprocity and awareness are key to testimonials
6) never ignore the bulletin board messages or you’ll lose touch with friends
7) over time, you will identify with the question mark

Continue reading

plaxo and ?spam?

I’ve received a few dozen requests for contact information via Plaxo now. In theory, this sounds brilliant. Having just lost my cell phone and corrupted my addressbook, i’ve been begging folks to write to me with their phone, address, and birthday (*hint*hint*).

But something is amiss. Out of all of these requests, i’ve only *recognized* the names of 3 people who requested my information (including the one today). I get these blank requests from people asking for my contact information. No explanation. Perhaps we know each other via research or blogs, but there is no note or qualifier. It’s really odd. Besides, many of them are using email addresses that are either dead or from my website (not the ones that i normally use to write to people).

I’ve decided that i’m not going to put my data in Plaxo for anyone, whether i know them or not. I just don’t really feel comfortable with the fact that so many of the people who ask me for Plaxo contact information are completely foreign to me. Am i being weird?