Fernanda and i have been working our tooshies off to finish a paper that we wanted to submit to HICSS-37. We’ve been trying to articulate how our visualizations are actually useful as digital artifacts for remembering and storytelling. They provide snapshots of one’s digital presence, but they are coarse enough to allow you to construct your identity in the sharing, presenting on what you see fit to present. Much fun. Anyhow, a draft version is available for the curious.
Monthly Archives: June 2003
a “gender” rant, alphabetizing
OK. In recent months, i’ve been signing up to a million different services, testing things out or just outright curious. Sites often ask you your “gender.” Of course, this drives me batty because the question is usually asking you your sex. Then there are the options. Male/Female. Everywhere else on these sites, you are asked questions with an alphabetical listing (except for anything involving a date which is done in a month by month listing). Why is sex any different? Oh right, patriarchy and sexism and a clear reminder that tools are built by guys. ::grumble::
envisioning next gen tech
I’ve been trying to figure out why technology without deep consideration of social behavior drives me batty. There is no doubt that some of the best technologies emerged from tech geeks wanting to make really cool and interesting things. Of course, spending 3 years in a place that focused on inventing the next generation of cool things made me wanna curl up in a ball and die. Distruptive technologies come out of a special type of bubble… one that doesn’t realize that it’s unique or different, filled with people who are truly in love with the idea and not focused on whether it will make money or whether it will do anything or not even realizing it as a “product” so much as a “toy.”
The problem is that the technology field has matured. Most ideas that are currently being discussed are simple technologies that expect fundamental changes in social behavior. Even the software ideas that people are talking about are new renditions of old systems. Blogs aren’t new, but they’ve been repackaged. Social networking tools aren’t new… None of the social software that’s being discussed is revolutionary. It’s simply trying to solve people’s needs, their interests. Yet, what’s the value in doing so without a deep and directed consideration of the impact? Software development has reached a new stage. Tools that affect social behavior can be easily used to marginalize populations; they can be just as easily distructive as helpful. We no longer live in a society where only the most intrigued play with computer or online. Impact is widespread and thus, so can abuse be. Even old technologies, developed with good intentions have come back to haunt people in odd ways. Things have definitely changed, and not completely for the better.
Now that we’re beyond the tech boom, i find myself continuously harping on folks to step back and really reconsider what might happen when they construct their technology, particularly if it is socially directed. Kudos to those who were able to innovate and distribute amazing tools through pure passion. I just don’t think that successful innovation in that culture is justification for not really deeply considering the implications of what is created in this one. I want to be surrounded by those who realize that they have the power to construct society and want to do so in a socially minded way.
Of course, the problem is that i can’t fully articulate why i feel this way, but i’m trying to disentangle that gutteral knot that i suspect has some validity to it (in the fabric of my reality).
[This is partially inspired by Marc’s perspective on the world.]
booth babing is hard
OK. My ass is *kicked*. I’ve spent the last three days running around the Moscone Center telling folks about the Urban Adventure for JavaOne (a.k.a. The Go Game). Three days of smiling pretty, talking small talk, being energetic and witty and silly and pretending to smile when i’m treated like a bimbette (all the while teaching my fellow babes Object Oriented Java). Of course, the event went off with a bang and people had a great time (except for those who were cranky that they didn’t win.)
Oh, and damn those who blamed me for not giving them a good score, because i was being good and honest! I wrote my own adventure, which was utterly reminscent of my days as a CS15 TA:
Task: Find the Java Princess (me dressed up in a prom dress and tiara in front of the Virgin Megastore) and impress her with your Java talent. Compose a short applet and enact it. Be creative!
Some of those teams had me dying of laughter – i got hugs and kisses and silly poems about Java written for me. Only one team perfected the skill of compileable code complete with humor, originality and sweetness. Too many teams assumed that i knew nothing about Java or didn’t know much about it themselves. But they were cute and i gave a *lot* of points for trying. Seriously, the TA in me came out full swing!
Oh, and i met a really nice stranger on the street and had a lovely (broken) conversation as teams came and went. Plus, it was funny to watch how the questions directed towards me changed as night fell. At first, strangers kept asking if i was getting married. After night fall, i was asked if i was a prostitute. What bride or prostitute would be wearing a blue prom dress, a fuzzy tiara, cowboy boots, and a spiky collar standing on a street corner? Don’t answer that…
blog comments spam
OK.. i’m not a big fan of the systems out there that leave “comments” on my blog which are simply spam and points to their porn or business sites. I like the comments feature… i tend to start conversations with people based on those who reach out to comment interesting things in my blog. But i do not like going through and deleting the spam ones each day. ::grumble::
email visualization
Folks at USC have developed a visualization of emails. I don’t get the bubbles. The system is called eArchivarius.
life without IM
Although i spend a lot of time researching social communities, i tend to avoid meeting new people online. It’s not that i don’t trust people online (because they usually come via friends or via interests), but that i am dreadful at maintaining virtual or long distance relationships, let alone building them. At the same time, i was thinking how essential virtual connections are for me to maintain my real life friendships. While cell phones are essential for maintaining face in teenage culture, i definitely find IM pretty crucial for my life. I’m far more likely to ping my IM friends for dinner and see them more often simply because i can reach out to them with ease. I keep up with my IM friends on daily life activities and they end up being my trusted network. I become friends far more quickly with friends i’ve met offline who have IM than those who do not. This was definitely true in college, but i’m surprised at how much it has persisted to this day and been impacted by the fact that many of my friends have stopped using IM and have fallen off of my daily radar.
disagreement in fotolog
Fotolog, the popular site for posting pictures went to a pay model, causing great outrage amongst many members, who showed their disagreement with protest photos. Underlying all of this is a discussion of high and low art.
RAVE Act Suppresses Speach
Everyone knows that the RAVE Act is going to be used to suppress liberal speech, particularly that which questions the government’s drug policies. Well, the DEA has started its attacks… As warped as this is, i’m actually *very* glad that the first big attack is against NORML which has unprecedented supports in the population at large and is heavily focused on marijuana-only reform (instead of drugs at large). Since NORML will have the political support to fight them, and something like 60% of the population believes that marijuana should be legal, the outcome could be quite interesting. It’s going to be a scary decade.
rape for crack
Because of my work with V-Day, i hear about a lot of horrifying rape and abuse stories. But it’s been a long time since one just floored me. An article came out this week describing how a grandmother, in desperate need of her crack offered her granddaughter as payment. She sat there and listened as the crack dealer brutally raped her granddaughter and then forced her to urinate and shower to conceal the evidence. When it was reported to the cops, she identified a different man to protect her dealer. OMG.