« you live, you learn |
Main
| politics of breathing »
July 14, 2005my queer dyke cuntI officially feel like an angry dyke because the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has deemed my identity "vulgar." In denying "Dykes on Bikes" a trademark, the attorney decided that 'dyke' is offensive, scandalous and vulgar. I love how people in power are allowed to regulate the self-identification of marginalized populations. Don't they realize that we've spent generations trying to take back the terms that they have used to oppress us? These are *their* terms and we've reclaimed them. Now they're ours. And since they are now ours, they can oppress by regulating them. Brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Update: i'm an idiot and forgot to thank Jason Schultz for keeping me abreast of all this. And bless him for being willing to go to bat for us crazy dykes. Technorati Tags: queer Category: gender & sexuality Posted by zephoria at July 14, 2005 9:50 AM
| TrackBack
|
Comments (14)
Wow, that totally sucks. Where do we write angry letters? I bet Greg Aharonian of PATNEWS, who's a big critic of the Patent Office's stupidities, would know.
Posted by Lisa Williams | July 14, 2005 12:30 PM
Posted on July 14, 2005 12:30
Is it me, or wasn't N.W.A. a trademark?
Posted by Charlie | July 14, 2005 12:59 PM
Posted on July 14, 2005 12:59
huh?
The USPTO isn't regulating "the self-identification of marginalized populations." They're just saying you can't use "Dyke" in a trademark. Nothing is stopping Dykes on Bikes from continuing to call themselves that, they just can't trademark that particular name.
Kinda like I can't trademark "Honkeys on Donkeys" (sounds funnier than "on Bikes") , "Kykes on Bikes", "Mother Fuckers on Bikes", "Ass Rimming Blow Job Givers on Bikes", "Chinks on Bikes", or "Niggers on Bikes" as they'd be offensive, scandalous and/or vulgar. I can still create groups with those names, I just can't trademark them.
If Dykes on Bikes feels they need trademark protections, they might want to consider trademarking "D.o.B." or "DoB" Although I'm not sure why they'd want to trademark their name anyway. Are there competing lesbian biker groups trying to use the same name?
Posted by gandalf23 | July 14, 2005 1:20 PM
Posted on July 14, 2005 13:20
the question is whether "dyke" has been successfully coopted, or if it is still a slur.
the DoB organizers note in the article that "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" seems to have had no trouble at the USPTO.
Posted by Eric | July 14, 2005 1:47 PM
Posted on July 14, 2005 13:47
I just read the linked article. Should've done that first :)
"Some of the women involved in the "dyke" case took the patent office rejection personally. For them, it reignited painful memories -- some not too distant -- of shouted insults labeling them "bull dykes."
Germany, 48, said she heard that slur a lot as she was growing up in Marin County. She still hears it from hecklers who see the rainbow sticker on the back of her black motorcycle helmet."
Sounds like "dyke" is still being used as a slur.
Queer is a bit different. It means strange or deviating from the expected. My grandfather and uncle used it as a carpentry term to mean bent or not straight. "This board's a little queer. Hand me that straight one." As far as I know, "dyke" only refers to a lesbian, it does not have any other meanings.
Posted by gandalf23 | July 15, 2005 8:58 AM
Posted on July 15, 2005 08:58
Since I'm not familiar with queer history, could you give a pointer to the rest of us to the history of the word "dyke" or "dike" and how it is "*their* term"? I know the history of the word "Chicano" becaus I am one...
Posted by joe | July 15, 2005 9:32 AM
Posted on July 15, 2005 09:32
wow... i was watching this unfold yesterday on the 'circuit' if you will... you posted, then the Gate ran on it... then it blew up... pretty interesting just a rant on some words could propagate so quickly.
anyway, i thought it was cool... well, goodluck with the name registration, i'm sure some law-gger out there could give you some advice as to a rebutal to their decision...
hey chicano joe, words aren't worth a thing outside of the perspective of the person using that word... why bother with the word man, round it up man, easy.
Posted by p@ | July 15, 2005 1:20 PM
Posted on July 15, 2005 13:20
"If Dykes on Bikes feels they need trademark protections, they might want to consider trademarking "D.o.B." or "DoB" Although I'm not sure why they'd want to trademark their name anyway. Are there competing lesbian biker groups trying to use the same name?"
That's a pretty myopic view, no? I have some friends who run a custom clothing business called Dykes in the City. As they won't be able to obtain a trademark, there's nothing to prevent anyone else from ripping off their name. They could trademark DITC, but they want to market their clothing to dykes, which has unfortunately been dubbed "offensive" by the USPTO.
Also, as noted in the comments over on BoingBoing, the USPTO doesn't seem to have much trouble issuing trademarks for the term "bitch" which, to me, is far more offensive than "Ass Rimming Blow Job Givers" (which I personally would have no trouble issuing a trademark on, but hey, I'm a liberal ;)).
Posted by barb dybwad | July 15, 2005 2:05 PM
Posted on July 15, 2005 14:05
The word dyke does have many (geological) alternative meanings. The relative mainstream acceptance of the word queer has probably got more to do with the relative power of the male gay population, plus hetrosexism in general.
The noun by the way is charmingly apt in this context: 'dyker'
Posted by Josie Fraser | July 16, 2005 5:23 AM
Posted on July 16, 2005 05:23
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/youandyours/listenagain/thursday.shtml
Link to a really interesting story on Radio 4 today about the Spazz Wheelchair and the rights of communities to reclaim names.
Posted by Josie Fraser | July 21, 2005 3:33 PM
Posted on July 21, 2005 15:33
I like dykes,,,,,,,,i like bikes,,,,,,,i like apophenia,,whatever the fuck it is,,,,when someone dont like you for who you are it is they who are missing out on the big picture of life,,,too many lil details can really sidetrack you sometimes,,,,,DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Posted by Daveman | December 13, 2005 3:09 PM
Posted on December 13, 2005 15:09
You realize that all those terms were never yours to begin with? They were made up to oppress you. You're not reclaiming them.
Make up your own fucking slang. Dyke.
Posted by Mr. Jigsaw | July 14, 2006 10:01 AM
Posted on July 14, 2006 10:01
who gives a fuck you stupid fat meff, people will see u on a bike and they will know ur a dyke on a bike. becasue u probably look like a dyke, and thats why you are a dyke. what im trying to say is that ur a fucking lezzer because ur ugly and no one wants to dick you. x x x x x x x
Posted by paulo | February 21, 2007 8:19 AM
Posted on February 21, 2007 08:19
On face value, and thats exactly what I am measuring this on so there is your easy way out to destroy the points I make.
Homosexuality takes a lot of courage to proclaim in todays society, I admire you for that. Those who deride it should look at the fact animals display homosexual traits and behaviours. Put down your bible people, it doesn't need another bashing. Homosexuality is one of the many flavours of sexual desire and, science suggests, a natural occurrence (bash that bible some more, it WILL get rid of my sinful typing...).
Headline - I'm hetro, I don't whinge. Yes, I know you aren't going to like that comment. Yes we could liken it to oppressed people, slaves, communists, people with ginger hair. It has already been done it is boring.
I'm wondering where the f**k you got:
'how people in power are allowed to regulate the self-identification of marginalized populations'
from.
Regardless of sexuality, it suggests your head is up your own arse.
People who aren't LGBT (is that right)? People really don't care I hope, and just let people live their own lives as they want. If it hurts no-one (do not judge lest thee be for all the horrified brainwashed religious people out there. Why are YOU still reading)?
What annoys me - People who shove their sexuality in my face and whine.
I dated a girl from work, we didn't make out in the car park. Numerous lesbian/gay couples made a strong point of doing so, and at every opportunity proclaiming their sexuality with pride. So they should, until it gets very very very very very very dull.
Focus your energies elsewhere, like banning religion.
Take it steady
Jamie
Posted by Jamie | February 27, 2007 9:55 PM
Posted on February 27, 2007 21:55