<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overprotective parenting and bullying: Who is to blame for the suicide of Megan Meier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html</link>
	<description>making connections where none previously existed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney C. Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-3607416</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney C. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-3607416</guid>
		<description>Bullying is a tough  nut to crack.  Unfortunately, despite considerableefforts at the school level, without wider community support, the impact of programs and other school individual interventions have been limited. I try to refrain from commenting on such cases as Meagan because there are too many unknowns. We tend to throw blame in all directions when no one &quot;saw it coming.&quot; Yet when someone responds like Lori, we see that the other extreme is just as dangerous. Is there a lesson here about being level-headed and taking a measuredapproach tailored to the actual situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullying is a tough  nut to crack.  Unfortunately, despite considerableefforts at the school level, without wider community support, the impact of programs and other school individual interventions have been limited. I try to refrain from commenting on such cases as Meagan because there are too many unknowns. We tend to throw blame in all directions when no one &#8220;saw it coming.&#8221; Yet when someone responds like Lori, we see that the other extreme is just as dangerous. Is there a lesson here about being level-headed and taking a measuredapproach tailored to the actual situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kath</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-531511</link>
		<dc:creator>Kath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-531511</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s disturbing to hear stories such as this and I know the impact of bullying having been through it at a young age.   It&#039;s just  a different channel of communication but effectively the same message, and just as damaging. It actually motivated me to set up a multi media bullying resource to try and help young children aged between 5 - 8 understand about bullying and how to prevent being a bully. Although it&#039;s general based on school bullying it makes me wonder whether we should develop one for young children to understand cyber bullies.  It&#039;s an important issue that I believe needs to be dealt with at an early age to boost confidence and understanding.  Any thoughts?

Kath
www.bullyinginschool.org (not a blatant plug of a web site!! but your thoughts would be appreciated)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s disturbing to hear stories such as this and I know the impact of bullying having been through it at a young age.   It&#8217;s just  a different channel of communication but effectively the same message, and just as damaging. It actually motivated me to set up a multi media bullying resource to try and help young children aged between 5 &#8211; 8 understand about bullying and how to prevent being a bully. Although it&#8217;s general based on school bullying it makes me wonder whether we should develop one for young children to understand cyber bullies.  It&#8217;s an important issue that I believe needs to be dealt with at an early age to boost confidence and understanding.  Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Kath<br />
<a href="http://www.bullyinginschool.org" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.bullyinginschool.org?referer=');">http://www.bullyinginschool.org</a> (not a blatant plug of a web site!! but your thoughts would be appreciated)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17224</link>
		<dc:creator>Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17224</guid>
		<description>I have a 15 year old daughter who is at the receiving end of an adult bully&#039;s abuse.  Her sin?  Not remaining friends with the adult bully&#039;s daughter!  The abuse extends beyond cyber-bullying (on Facebook) to intimidation at school, rumours in the community etc.


My daughter seems to be handling it well by ignoring this woman, I on the other hand feel helpless to protect her because adult-on-child bullying is so unbelievable.


My heart goes out to any parents in the same situation...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 15 year old daughter who is at the receiving end of an adult bully&#8217;s abuse.  Her sin?  Not remaining friends with the adult bully&#8217;s daughter!  The abuse extends beyond cyber-bullying (on Facebook) to intimidation at school, rumours in the community etc.</p>
<p>My daughter seems to be handling it well by ignoring this woman, I on the other hand feel helpless to protect her because adult-on-child bullying is so unbelievable.</p>
<p>My heart goes out to any parents in the same situation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah H</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17223</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17223</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why do you say that &quot;Revenge is foolish in every context&quot;? At a minimum, revenge can serve as a deterent; it can also provide a sense of fairness and satisfaction for the person harmed, and can provide some closure and sense of fairness for the person doing the harm. Unless I&#039;m misunderstanding what you mean by &quot;revenge&quot;.


Tim, you have got to be kidding right? You are not seriously advocating the use of revenge no matter what happens? Let me tell you something...I am a victim of bullying that was so extreme and swift in its movements I took an overdose. It was intentionl and the pain I felt (initially )when I survived was one of despair...I didn&#039;t want to be here. Not once have I attempted or allowed ANYONE to take revenge on the two people that bullied me. If you don&#039;t understand that revenge is just pre-meditated bullying then start reading, learning and understanding. What I did do, was hold them accountable for their actions by involving the police and letting a third party deal with it who both had the authority to deal with the situation and the lack of emotional ties to the agressors to be blown off with a &quot;It wasnt bullying, you are just too sensitive.&quot;


There is NEVER an excuse for revenge. EVER!




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why do you say that &#8220;Revenge is foolish in every context&#8221;? At a minimum, revenge can serve as a deterent; it can also provide a sense of fairness and satisfaction for the person harmed, and can provide some closure and sense of fairness for the person doing the harm. Unless I&#8217;m misunderstanding what you mean by &#8220;revenge&#8221;.</p>
<p>Tim, you have got to be kidding right? You are not seriously advocating the use of revenge no matter what happens? Let me tell you something&#8230;I am a victim of bullying that was so extreme and swift in its movements I took an overdose. It was intentionl and the pain I felt (initially )when I survived was one of despair&#8230;I didn&#8217;t want to be here. Not once have I attempted or allowed ANYONE to take revenge on the two people that bullied me. If you don&#8217;t understand that revenge is just pre-meditated bullying then start reading, learning and understanding. What I did do, was hold them accountable for their actions by involving the police and letting a third party deal with it who both had the authority to deal with the situation and the lack of emotional ties to the agressors to be blown off with a &#8220;It wasnt bullying, you are just too sensitive.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is NEVER an excuse for revenge. EVER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17222</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17222</guid>
		<description>I am not a mother but i am an 18 year old senior in high school. Creating a fake profile to terrorize a 13 year old child is not what most would call as &quot;protective parenting&quot;. The mother of the other girl should have been the &quot;adult&quot; and confronted Megan about the issues she was having with her daughter face to face. Not call her fat and a slut online while pretending to be a boy. That is childish, something another 13 or 14 year old would do to a person they didn&#039;t like. There are better ways to handle such situations. Obviously Megan&#039;s &quot;darker side&quot; played on the girl but it did not drive her to committ suicide. Instead her mother drove Megan to suicide. Helping your children is something that people need to do, help them to resolve problems themselves. Your children look up to you, they look to you for guidance and resolution. Does Lori Drews&#039; daughter look at her mother and see a hero, someone who protected me when i needed it? Or does she see a murderer like everyone else sees?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a mother but i am an 18 year old senior in high school. Creating a fake profile to terrorize a 13 year old child is not what most would call as &#8220;protective parenting&#8221;. The mother of the other girl should have been the &#8220;adult&#8221; and confronted Megan about the issues she was having with her daughter face to face. Not call her fat and a slut online while pretending to be a boy. That is childish, something another 13 or 14 year old would do to a person they didn&#8217;t like. There are better ways to handle such situations. Obviously Megan&#8217;s &#8220;darker side&#8221; played on the girl but it did not drive her to committ suicide. Instead her mother drove Megan to suicide. Helping your children is something that people need to do, help them to resolve problems themselves. Your children look up to you, they look to you for guidance and resolution. Does Lori Drews&#8217; daughter look at her mother and see a hero, someone who protected me when i needed it? Or does she see a murderer like everyone else sees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17221</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17221</guid>
		<description>messels,


I have to disagree strongly with your implication that since danah is not a mother, she has no standing to criticize maternal behavior. We have all had mothers - and most of us have had them with us as we grew up. Most of us have had a chance to see other people&#039;s mothers and compare them to our own. In addition, parenting is a widely discussed and studied social issue. Certainly a parent has a special perspective on that issue which is of value - but to say that they are the only ones qualified to speak is just wrong!


-Steve
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>messels,</p>
<p>I have to disagree strongly with your implication that since danah is not a mother, she has no standing to criticize maternal behavior. We have all had mothers &#8211; and most of us have had them with us as we grew up. Most of us have had a chance to see other people&#8217;s mothers and compare them to our own. In addition, parenting is a widely discussed and studied social issue. Certainly a parent has a special perspective on that issue which is of value &#8211; but to say that they are the only ones qualified to speak is just wrong!</p>
<p>-Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17220</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17220</guid>
		<description>danah, people are not reading the comments, and therefore aren&#039;t aware that most of this discussion is based on fabricated events. Don&#039;t you think you should update your post to reflect the truth?




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>danah, people are not reading the comments, and therefore aren&#8217;t aware that most of this discussion is based on fabricated events. Don&#8217;t you think you should update your post to reflect the truth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Bluehouse</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17219</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Bluehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17219</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just catching this story now... It seems to me that this isn&#039;t new. We just have new tools for our cruelty.  Let me tell you about the time my mom barged into my room and started screaming about me being a drug addict, literally held me down on the ground making accusations...because someone&#039;s &quot;mom&quot; got involved in my life... And my mom is a pretty balanced woman - I wonder about the women who aren&#039;t so &quot;balanced&quot;.


&lt;a href=&quot;http://stuartcollection.ucsd.edu/StuartCollection/HolzerTruism.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Children are the cruelest of all&lt;/a&gt;


&quot;Get involved in their child&#039;s life.&quot; (remember Heathers?) I think the trouble is folks don&#039;t seem to know how to get involved (in a healthy and productive way).


Media and real life models are true to the cruelest truism, and in a sensational world, that cruelty is amplified as we lose the boring end of communication that stresses balance, understanding, talk, non-judgmental discussion. Our lives filter out the rational...add the bonding power of &quot;trash-talking&quot;, and &quot;bitching&quot; and we get events like Megan&#039;s suicide.  Because the drama creates and maintains friendships and connections. - even if it is utterly manufactured.


Parents do not belong in &quot;children&#039;s spaces&quot; - period.  They as grown-ups no longer have the innocence? (Dust? perhaps?) to understand the subtlety of the dynamic... as a grown-up, I can remember what it was like to be cast out weekly, and the memory, unresolved creates/enforces the protective sphere.


I learned somewhere along the way that drama=bonding, and when that is the only bonding we have to hold, the cruelty is magnified in the protective sphere. So I&#039;m certain, that Lori felt that she should teach her a lesson... I&#039;m also guessing that (and I&#039;ll say the unspeakable here)  that Megan may have hurt Lori&#039;s daughter quite a bit - social group forming and cliquing are some pretty painful knives to twist...  so Lori; &quot;got involved&quot;  presumably &#039;innocently&#039;, but what Megan did/told Lori&#039;s daughter... that&#039;s the gossip I want aired.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just catching this story now&#8230; It seems to me that this isn&#8217;t new. We just have new tools for our cruelty.  Let me tell you about the time my mom barged into my room and started screaming about me being a drug addict, literally held me down on the ground making accusations&#8230;because someone&#8217;s &#8220;mom&#8221; got involved in my life&#8230; And my mom is a pretty balanced woman &#8211; I wonder about the women who aren&#8217;t so &#8220;balanced&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcollection.ucsd.edu/StuartCollection/HolzerTruism.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/stuartcollection.ucsd.edu/StuartCollection/HolzerTruism.htm?referer=');">Children are the cruelest of all</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Get involved in their child&#8217;s life.&#8221; (remember Heathers?) I think the trouble is folks don&#8217;t seem to know how to get involved (in a healthy and productive way).</p>
<p>Media and real life models are true to the cruelest truism, and in a sensational world, that cruelty is amplified as we lose the boring end of communication that stresses balance, understanding, talk, non-judgmental discussion. Our lives filter out the rational&#8230;add the bonding power of &#8220;trash-talking&#8221;, and &#8220;bitching&#8221; and we get events like Megan&#8217;s suicide.  Because the drama creates and maintains friendships and connections. &#8211; even if it is utterly manufactured.</p>
<p>Parents do not belong in &#8220;children&#8217;s spaces&#8221; &#8211; period.  They as grown-ups no longer have the innocence? (Dust? perhaps?) to understand the subtlety of the dynamic&#8230; as a grown-up, I can remember what it was like to be cast out weekly, and the memory, unresolved creates/enforces the protective sphere.</p>
<p>I learned somewhere along the way that drama=bonding, and when that is the only bonding we have to hold, the cruelty is magnified in the protective sphere. So I&#8217;m certain, that Lori felt that she should teach her a lesson&#8230; I&#8217;m also guessing that (and I&#8217;ll say the unspeakable here)  that Megan may have hurt Lori&#8217;s daughter quite a bit &#8211; social group forming and cliquing are some pretty painful knives to twist&#8230;  so Lori; &#8220;got involved&#8221;  presumably &#8216;innocently&#8217;, but what Megan did/told Lori&#8217;s daughter&#8230; that&#8217;s the gossip I want aired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.L.</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17218</link>
		<dc:creator>M.L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17218</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually pretty surprised the blog content was deleted, leaving just one final post. I don&#039;t know which is worse though, the blog or Encyclopedia Dramatica&#039;s entry about her. I was so disturbed by some of the content I had to stop reading it...despite the fact that I&#039;m currently working on a paper about the topic.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually pretty surprised the blog content was deleted, leaving just one final post. I don&#8217;t know which is worse though, the blog or Encyclopedia Dramatica&#8217;s entry about her. I was so disturbed by some of the content I had to stop reading it&#8230;despite the fact that I&#8217;m currently working on a paper about the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: messels</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html/comment-page-1#comment-17217</link>
		<dc:creator>messels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2007/12/05/overprotective.html#comment-17217</guid>
		<description>reading over the comments, i&#039;m not sure why people got their knickers in a bunch over &quot;christian society.&quot;  as far as i can tell, most of our laws (and morals by extension) are christian in nature.  lol.  we&#039;ve NEVER had a non-christian president.  so, yeah...


that being said, i know you&#039;re an [academic] expert at youth and the net but it&#039;s going to be impossible for you to make a claim on how a mother should and shouldn&#039;t act since you have no idea [becuase you don&#039;t have a child].  i&#039;d just be careful i guess because when i was reading your post, i kept thinking, &quot;well, how would you know?&quot;


that being said, i felt your arguments were 1000x stronger when kept to a criticism of lori as an adult, something you are qualified to speak on. ;-)  all in all, what happened is a real shame.


problem is lori was no more guilty of a _crime_ than most gov&#039; administrators.  (in that they take advantage of others, namely the people they&#039;re suppose to represent, by way of information and perception control).


btw, i also liked your general critique of our current social structure:
&quot;At the same time, her perspective signals some absolute failures in American society, our ability to rationally communicate, and Lori&#039;s inability to imagine potential costs of her decisions.&quot;


i&#039;d personally like to hear more on &quot;failures in american society.&quot;  seems to be mostly an issue of alienation, something only exacerbated by the intenet and all its coolness.


cheers!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reading over the comments, i&#8217;m not sure why people got their knickers in a bunch over &#8220;christian society.&#8221;  as far as i can tell, most of our laws (and morals by extension) are christian in nature.  lol.  we&#8217;ve NEVER had a non-christian president.  so, yeah&#8230;</p>
<p>that being said, i know you&#8217;re an [academic] expert at youth and the net but it&#8217;s going to be impossible for you to make a claim on how a mother should and shouldn&#8217;t act since you have no idea [becuase you don't have a child].  i&#8217;d just be careful i guess because when i was reading your post, i kept thinking, &#8220;well, how would you know?&#8221;</p>
<p>that being said, i felt your arguments were 1000x stronger when kept to a criticism of lori as an adult, something you are qualified to speak on. <img src='http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   all in all, what happened is a real shame.</p>
<p>problem is lori was no more guilty of a _crime_ than most gov&#8217; administrators.  (in that they take advantage of others, namely the people they&#8217;re suppose to represent, by way of information and perception control).</p>
<p>btw, i also liked your general critique of our current social structure:<br />
&#8220;At the same time, her perspective signals some absolute failures in American society, our ability to rationally communicate, and Lori&#8217;s inability to imagine potential costs of her decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>i&#8217;d personally like to hear more on &#8220;failures in american society.&#8221;  seems to be mostly an issue of alienation, something only exacerbated by the intenet and all its coolness.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

