Comments on: let the stalking begin

By: Jay Smith

Jay Smith — Sun, 23 May 2010 19:50:21 +0000

This begs the question why you would allow the Church of Scientology to track your children, or in the case of Lotter’s CRM business why would you want the Church of Scientology following your business contacts? E-agency and other Lotter operated businesses appear to be fronts for the Church of Scientology as Lotter and most of his management team are active in the Church of Scientology and the Church of Scientology has promoted Lotter and Lotter’s businesses. Who owns and operates E-agency’s servers? Where is personal, private and business information that is collected by E-agency for its clients stored? Is E-agency, its related financial management company and insurance company actually owned by the Church of Scientology and if so are you still willing to trust your personal and business data to such an entity?

By: Nerdx07

Nerdx07 — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:50:54 +0000

I am 14 and very interested in computers and technology. I know i’m a bit young to be sumbitting comments towards this but I just feel my comment in a teenagers point of view is very important.

For one, mobile technology has become way more advanced than this. You can pinpoint your child/spouse position with satelight pinpointing, in 3D. you can listen in on there conversations without them knowing, you can view there actions, there text messages, emails, blogging, ect ect with one special software that has advanced behind police & FBI’s backs.

This software can not be accessed google, bing, or any search engine. It is used by a glitched pop up that you can reach using usual stalking sites such as:
glitched myspace, face book or tagged. Hi-5 is even being hacked to register more of these stalking ads.
ads. They may not be what they seem. For example, if you see a low-detail ad, click on it and see where it takes you.

Why do I know all this? Because it was once used on me.
Do not fret, mainly people with unusual emails:
ones with frequent other languages, lots of numbers and lots of underscores. this is not a real email (well it may be) and is not associated with this software. It is just an example:
recesmeinold_08375888234@examplemail.com

these are the ones that send you emails for discount handbags, loose weight, transferring money into your bank, ect ect. spam, mainly.
always check the email.

i am not giving the name of the software, i will leave you to embrace in this awesome mystery of stalking.

By: Harald Korneliussen

Harald Korneliussen — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:12:53 +0000

No, I don’t quite see the problem with this. My son will have a lot of opportunities for communication that I didn’t have, and in that special manner that he may feel anonymous and safe when he probably isn’t.

He’s not two yet. But my plan is, rather than restricting him from these new technologies like cell phones and net access, I will let him have unrestricted, but somewhat monitored access – and I won’t hide it from him, of course. For that matter, he could see my logs as well! Not contents of communication, unless we tell explicitly, but who? Definitively.

Blasting this because it does not solve the problems of abusing relatives… well, that’s not the problem this was supposed to solve. It was supposed to give children freedom, but accountability.

By: Paul

Paul — Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:16:42 +0000

Parents by blood are very unlikely molesters. When a parent molests, it’s usually a man birth mother meets after birth of child. This is not often printed in media, for political correctness reasons. Uncles and other blood relatives do molest, so I am not saying the blood tie is absolute.

As to the cell phone surveillance, It does provide some comfort to parents, for the rare case when a child is snatched. It will not help monitor when you kid is naughty, because they will realize very quickly they need to turn the phone off. It’s probably not worth the effort and family strain, but I might feel differently if I was a parent.

By: Sam Jackson

Sam Jackson — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:47:19 +0000

Didn’t find anything on our lame friend? A few seconds of google says he’s the CEO of eAgency (.com) which makes some other random stuff in addition to the privacy invading sort.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:24:42 +0000

Ryan,
It’s not well said in the article but most child molestation is done by close family members and family friends. Parents, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins and the parent’s close friends. Children are most often abused by people they already know and trust, not strangers.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Sun, 17 Jun 2007 09:11:29 +0000

I’m a great fan of this blog and often find your views enlightening considering my conservative view points but am appalled by this particular entry. For one calling the parent “the number 1 child molester” is down right horrible, no matter what metaphor you are supposedly implying.

Now, I do believe that there are over bearing parents out there who could with any other technology exploit it’s power. But, what so many seem to be forgetting is that the motivation behind this is love. While it may not be the right thing (mending relationships and building trust) to do it’s intentions are well met. This company is selling “peace of mind” for parents who are being bombarded with the evils broadcasted daily in the news.

By: Arian Kooshesh

Arian Kooshesh — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:30:46 +0000

spammers save the day, again. Just like on myspace.

By: sakthi

sakthi — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:56:49 +0000

No kid will like to be monitored by their parents,invariable of the kids who are not doing anything wrong and the kids who are hiding something from parents..So fear could sell but it cannot yield respect..
Breakdown Insurance

By: Charlie

Charlie — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 04:56:51 +0000

“technology does not solve relationship issues”

Amen.