At our Ferienhaus-Samui at Thailand there is
every Friday night a Fucking GUY Party around.

Tell me please when you are at Samui to resevate a free ACCOMODATION, but only for GUYS
Thank You

My Telephone Number is:
(0066) 085 – 619 69 66

If my wife pick up the phone, please tell her you would like to call me again

You best Friend , Thomas the hottest Boy at Samui

No, it’s not. It is prioritizing paid-for mass email over non-paid-for mass email. The problem is that the number of recipients of an email is one of the heuristics used to identify potential spam. But there are legitimate reasons an organization might send mass email–the reasoning here is that ability to pay can be correlated with credibility. That assumption runs into some issues with non-profits, but I don’t think those issues are insoluble (non-profits could encourage members to whitelist them, or pass the fees along to members in their dues). Personal email is a red herring–it mostly doesn’t suffer from the false positive problem because it doesn’t have massive recipient lists, and no email service is going to piss off its users by not delivering mail from their friends or family. They don’t want to piss them off by accidentally spam-filtering their PG&E bill either, which is why they’re turning to economic solutions.