<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On a Vetted Wikipedia, Reflexivity and Investment in Quality (a.k.a. more responses to Clay)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/01/08/on_a_vetted_wikipedia_reflexivity_and_investment_in_quality_aka_more_responses_to_clay.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/01/08/on_a_vetted_wikipedia_reflexivity_and_investment_in_quality_aka_more_responses_to_clay.html</link>
	<description>making connections where none previously existed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog.org</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/01/08/on_a_vetted_wikipedia_reflexivity_and_investment_in_quality_aka_more_responses_to_clay.html/comment-page-1#comment-7682</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2005/01/08/on_a_vetted_wikipedia_reflexivity_and_investment_in_quality_aka_more_responses_to_clay.html#comment-7682</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wikipedia is good but not that good&lt;/strong&gt;

Ethan Zuckerman has &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethan/2004/11/27#a568&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;written thoughtfully about Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; in response to a recent article (by a former editor of the Encyclopedia Britannica) suggesting it is impressive but its accuracy c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wikipedia is good but not that good</strong></p>
<p>Ethan Zuckerman has <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethan/2004/11/27#a568" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethan/2004/11/27_a568?referer=');">written thoughtfully about Wikipedia</a> in response to a recent article (by a former editor of the Encyclopedia Britannica) suggesting it is impressive but its accuracy c&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preoccupations</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/01/08/on_a_vetted_wikipedia_reflexivity_and_investment_in_quality_aka_more_responses_to_clay.html/comment-page-1#comment-7681</link>
		<dc:creator>Preoccupations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2005/01/08/on_a_vetted_wikipedia_reflexivity_and_investment_in_quality_aka_more_responses_to_clay.html#comment-7681</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wikipedia and the search for truth&lt;/strong&gt;

The debate about Wikipedia will no doubt continue for a long time. This post is written as a small contribution to it (and assumes some familiarity with the recent round of discussions). Jimmy Wales is quoted in Wired News as</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wikipedia and the search for truth</strong></p>
<p>The debate about Wikipedia will no doubt continue for a long time. This post is written as a small contribution to it (and assumes some familiarity with the recent round of discussions). Jimmy Wales is quoted in Wired News as</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

