<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrek 2 is stunning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html</link>
	<description>making connections where none previously existed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: police clothing</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>police clothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 03:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5247</guid>
		<description>thanks for this information
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredshouse.net</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5250</link>
		<dc:creator>fredshouse.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2004 12:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5250</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;shrek 2 rocks da house&lt;/strong&gt;

The fredshouse crew went over to PDI/DreamWorks tonight to see Shrek 2, and w00t, it rocked! You can go read the reviews if you like, they are mostly very positive, but take my advice and go see it this weekend....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>shrek 2 rocks da house</strong></p>
<p>The fredshouse crew went over to PDI/DreamWorks tonight to see Shrek 2, and w00t, it rocked! You can go read the reviews if you like, they are mostly very positive, but take my advice and go see it this weekend&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2004 07:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>If you thought the Toy Story baby was bad, check out the one in Pixar&#039;s own Tin Toy... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pixar.com/shorts/tt/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pixar.com/shorts/tt/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thought the Toy Story baby was bad, check out the one in Pixar&#8217;s own Tin Toy&#8230; <a href="http://www.pixar.com/shorts/tt/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pixar.com/shorts/tt/?referer=');">http://www.pixar.com/shorts/tt/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sia Manzarpour</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>Sia Manzarpour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2004 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>Dear Danah;


I came across your URL, quite by accident, and glad that I did.


Your interest in general public&#039;s adjustment to presentation of themselves, is perhaps amongst the oldest matters of contemplation.


I shall follow your work closely, as it reminds me so much of my days at oxford. It is a shame that we did not have access to &quot;instant presentation of ourselves&quot; on a global scale, then. This brings me to another point to contemplate upon, and that is;


&quot;Our technological advances with its enormous socioeconomic impact, only started since the discovery of electrical energy, say 100 years or so, ago. Why didn&#039;t the human race achieve such steep rate of advancement during, let&#039;s say pervious 5000 years?&quot;...It will help you, I hope, with your research.


Sleep tight, and keep away from those Tangerine drinks...


Best of luck.


Sia Manzarpour PhD.
Toronto, Canada


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Danah;</p>
<p>I came across your URL, quite by accident, and glad that I did.</p>
<p>Your interest in general public&#8217;s adjustment to presentation of themselves, is perhaps amongst the oldest matters of contemplation.</p>
<p>I shall follow your work closely, as it reminds me so much of my days at oxford. It is a shame that we did not have access to &#8220;instant presentation of ourselves&#8221; on a global scale, then. This brings me to another point to contemplate upon, and that is;</p>
<p>&#8220;Our technological advances with its enormous socioeconomic impact, only started since the discovery of electrical energy, say 100 years or so, ago. Why didn&#8217;t the human race achieve such steep rate of advancement during, let&#8217;s say pervious 5000 years?&#8221;&#8230;It will help you, I hope, with your research.</p>
<p>Sleep tight, and keep away from those Tangerine drinks&#8230;</p>
<p>Best of luck.</p>
<p>Sia Manzarpour PhD.<br />
Toronto, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sia Manzarpour</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Sia Manzarpour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2004 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5244</guid>
		<description>Dear Danah;


I came across your URL, quite by accident, and glad that I did.


Your interest in general public&#039;s adjustment to presentation of themselves, is perhaps amongst the oldest matters of contemplation.


I shall follow your work closely, as it reminds me so much of my days at oxford. It is a shame that we did not have access to &quot;instant presentation of ourselves&quot; on a global scale, then. This brings me to another point to contemplate upon, and that is;


&quot;Our technological advances with its enormous socioeconomic impact, only started since the discovery of electrical energy, say 100 years or so, ago. Why didn&#039;t the human race achieve such steep rate of advancement during, let&#039;s say pervious 5000 years?&quot;...It will help you, I hope, with your research.


Sleep tight, and keep away from those Tangerine drinks...


Best of luck.


Sia Manzarpour PhD.
Toronto, Canada


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Danah;</p>
<p>I came across your URL, quite by accident, and glad that I did.</p>
<p>Your interest in general public&#8217;s adjustment to presentation of themselves, is perhaps amongst the oldest matters of contemplation.</p>
<p>I shall follow your work closely, as it reminds me so much of my days at oxford. It is a shame that we did not have access to &#8220;instant presentation of ourselves&#8221; on a global scale, then. This brings me to another point to contemplate upon, and that is;</p>
<p>&#8220;Our technological advances with its enormous socioeconomic impact, only started since the discovery of electrical energy, say 100 years or so, ago. Why didn&#8217;t the human race achieve such steep rate of advancement during, let&#8217;s say pervious 5000 years?&#8221;&#8230;It will help you, I hope, with your research.</p>
<p>Sleep tight, and keep away from those Tangerine drinks&#8230;</p>
<p>Best of luck.</p>
<p>Sia Manzarpour PhD.<br />
Toronto, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezra</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 10:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>Topic for a future post: how soon until the Production phase is dead?


For the last hundred years, people made movies by spending lots of time in preproduction (assembling all the logistics of making a movie: writing screenplay, signing actors, building sets, etc).  The chief reason for this is that production--the actual filming of the movie--is prohibitively expensive; everything needs to be planned precisely before the cameras start rolling.  Filmmakers frequently shoot coverage which during production may seem unnecessary (my favorite example: prolonged shots of people&#039;s backs as they walk down corridors) because they know all too well that, in post-production, having some extra footage onto which they can slam a little dialogue may save them some IMMENSE cost and headaches.


But with the advent of CGI, is the production phase coming to be irrelevant?  No sets need to be built, actors are needed only for voice work, and ANYthing can be changed in post-production.  Obviously we&#039;re not all the way there (to the best of my knowledge, &quot;Final Fantasy&quot; is the only CGI movie that really tried to look like live-action, with mixed results), but we&#039;re getting closer.


Another link in the chain is that &quot;Sky Commander&quot; movie coming out this summer, in which no actual sets were built.  If it&#039;s successful, we&#039;ll be one step closer.  I think that, once a successful, &quot;realistic&quot; movie is made entirely using CGI, CGI production will rapidly become the standard because financially and logistically, it&#039;s going to become an awful lot easier to deal with than traditional filmmaking.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Topic for a future post: how soon until the Production phase is dead?</p>
<p>For the last hundred years, people made movies by spending lots of time in preproduction (assembling all the logistics of making a movie: writing screenplay, signing actors, building sets, etc).  The chief reason for this is that production&#8211;the actual filming of the movie&#8211;is prohibitively expensive; everything needs to be planned precisely before the cameras start rolling.  Filmmakers frequently shoot coverage which during production may seem unnecessary (my favorite example: prolonged shots of people&#8217;s backs as they walk down corridors) because they know all too well that, in post-production, having some extra footage onto which they can slam a little dialogue may save them some IMMENSE cost and headaches.</p>
<p>But with the advent of CGI, is the production phase coming to be irrelevant?  No sets need to be built, actors are needed only for voice work, and ANYthing can be changed in post-production.  Obviously we&#8217;re not all the way there (to the best of my knowledge, &#8220;Final Fantasy&#8221; is the only CGI movie that really tried to look like live-action, with mixed results), but we&#8217;re getting closer.</p>
<p>Another link in the chain is that &#8220;Sky Commander&#8221; movie coming out this summer, in which no actual sets were built.  If it&#8217;s successful, we&#8217;ll be one step closer.  I think that, once a successful, &#8220;realistic&#8221; movie is made entirely using CGI, CGI production will rapidly become the standard because financially and logistically, it&#8217;s going to become an awful lot easier to deal with than traditional filmmaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredshouse.net</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5249</link>
		<dc:creator>fredshouse.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5249</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;shrek 2 rocks da house&lt;/strong&gt;

The fredshouse crew went over to PDI/DreamWorks tonight to see Shrek 2, and w00t, it rocked! You can go read the reviews if you like, they are mostly very positive, but take my advice and go see it this weekend....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>shrek 2 rocks da house</strong></p>
<p>The fredshouse crew went over to PDI/DreamWorks tonight to see Shrek 2, and w00t, it rocked! You can go read the reviews if you like, they are mostly very positive, but take my advice and go see it this weekend&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity-Negro.com: A Dru Blood Fansite</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5248</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity-Negro.com: A Dru Blood Fansite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 12:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5248</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I see what time it is&lt;/strong&gt;

But am I bitter? Why yes, yes I am. Thank you for asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I see what time it is</strong></p>
<p>But am I bitter? Why yes, yes I am. Thank you for asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html/comment-page-1#comment-5242</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 05:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2004/05/11/shrek_2_is_stunning.html#comment-5242</guid>
		<description>Hey,I&#039;m 32 and not ashamed to admit-I liked Shrek! Funny and clever. If 2 is half as good as danah says it is I&#039;m there!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,I&#8217;m 32 and not ashamed to admit-I liked Shrek! Funny and clever. If 2 is half as good as danah says it is I&#8217;m there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

