<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the public nature of blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2003/07/15/the_public_nature_of_blogging.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2003/07/15/the_public_nature_of_blogging.html</link>
	<description>making connections where none previously existed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zephoria</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2003/07/15/the_public_nature_of_blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-2701</link>
		<dc:creator>zephoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2003/07/15/the_public_nature_of_blogging.html#comment-2701</guid>
		<description>Zay - it&#039;s hard to figure out what is best.  I took a look at my logs and i&#039;m guessing that 1/3 of the people who read my blog are my friends, 1/3 are people who work in the area that i do and 1/3 are Ani DiFranco fans who know me through my Ani page.


Interestingly, about 1/3 of the blogs i read are friends&#039;, 1/3 are other intellectuals and 1/3 are LJs of folks that i only know digitally.


There is a certain amount of social appropriateness to linking to other researchers.  And my friends can for the most part ignore those pointers.  The problem is that most of my friends don&#039;t really intend for others (professional folks or other friends of mine) to read their blog.  The sad part is that i fail to give public kudos to their efforst in an attempt to be socially appropriate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zay &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to figure out what is best.  I took a look at my logs and i&#8217;m guessing that 1/3 of the people who read my blog are my friends, 1/3 are people who work in the area that i do and 1/3 are Ani DiFranco fans who know me through my Ani page.</p>
<p>Interestingly, about 1/3 of the blogs i read are friends&#8217;, 1/3 are other intellectuals and 1/3 are LJs of folks that i only know digitally.</p>
<p>There is a certain amount of social appropriateness to linking to other researchers.  And my friends can for the most part ignore those pointers.  The problem is that most of my friends don&#8217;t really intend for others (professional folks or other friends of mine) to read their blog.  The sad part is that i fail to give public kudos to their efforst in an attempt to be socially appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zay</title>
		<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2003/07/15/the_public_nature_of_blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-2700</link>
		<dc:creator>zay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntu.my/wp30/archives/2003/07/15/the_public_nature_of_blogging.html#comment-2700</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s funny. i&#039;d never read a blog before i started looking at yours. i looked through the blogs linked in the sidebar, and was surprised that none of them had a more personal tone. nice to know there&#039;s a reason.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s funny. i&#8217;d never read a blog before i started looking at yours. i looked through the blogs linked in the sidebar, and was surprised that none of them had a more personal tone. nice to know there&#8217;s a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

